后记：
该篇文章完成前后都得到梁慧星教授的指导，在此向梁教授表示由衷的感谢。在对“欧盟民法典”、“欧盟合同法原则”、“欧盟法院”等等这些术语进行翻译时，也曾与梁老师探讨过是用“欧盟”还是“欧洲”更为合适。由于过去国内的翻译都是直接使成“欧洲合同法原则”、“欧洲法院”等等，再三斟酌后，决定还是使用“欧盟”这一翻译更为准确。虽然Principles of European Contract Law，European Court of Justice在直译上应当为“欧洲合同法原则”、“欧洲法院”，但是对于非欧洲学者来说，“欧洲”一词可能容易造成理解上的不准确，因为这些法律和机构效力上都只适用于欧盟成员国，而并非所有欧洲国家。或许是由于欧盟学者期待这些法律或者欧盟机构今后效力上都能扩大到整个欧洲领域，所以术语上使用了“欧洲”而非“欧盟”。但是对于外国学者来说，翻译上使用“欧盟”更容易准确的理解。正如我国合同法，在西方国家的论述中，有很多学者也习惯的加上“mainland China”（中国大陆）字样，以使其国内读者更准确了解“中国合同法”仅适用于中国大陆。
【作者简介】
付俊伟，华盛顿大学法学院访问学者。
【注释】H.C. Nipperdey,‘ Gleicher Lohn der Fraüfur gleiche Leistung’, Recht der Arbeit 1950, p. 121-128.
Chantal Mak, The Constitution of a Common Frame of Reference for European Contract Law, Center for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series, 2008/06, p. 2.
Chantal Mak, Harmonising effects of fundamental rights in European Contract Law, Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 01, 2007, p. 63.
Chantal Mak, Fundamental Rights in European Contract Law: A Comparison of the Impact of Fundamental Rights on Contractual Relationships in Germany, the Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 2008, pp. 12-32.
C.A. Gearty, European Civil Liberties and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Comparative Study, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997, pp. 5-32.
Book VI.–2:203: Infringement of dignity, liberty and privacy, Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition, european law publishers, 2008, p. 305.
Book I.–1:102: They are to be read in the light of any applicable instruments guaranteeing human rights and fundamental freedoms and any applicable constitutional laws.
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition, european law publishers, 2008, p. 37.
Martijn W. Hesselink, The Common Frame of Reference as a source of European Private Law, Centre of the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series, 2008/10, pp. 5-12.
Regulations (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II).
Christian von Bar, Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another under the DCFR, ERA Forum, Vo. 9, 2008, p. S34.
Brigitta Lurger, The “Social” Side of Contract Law and the New Principle of Regard and Fairness, Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, Carla Joustra, Edgar du Perron, Muriel Veldman, Towards a European Civil Code, Kluwer Law International, 2004, pp. 273-274.
Thom van Mierlo, Consumer Protection on the Single Market: Self-Regulation for Dating Services, Katharina Boele-Woelki, Willem Grosheide, The Future of European Contract Law: Essays in Honor of Ewoud Hondius, Western Europe, 2008, pp. 411-424.
Diana Wallis, Expectations for the Final Common Frame of Reference, ERA Forum, Vol. 9, 2008, pp. S9-S11.
Jan Smits, The Draft-Common Frame of Reference for a European Private Law: Fit for Purpose? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 2008, pp. 145-148.
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition, european law publishers, 2008, p. 5.
Jocobien W. Rutgers, The Draft Common Frame of Reference, Public Policy, Mandatory Rules and the Welfare State, Seminar Paper of the Center of European Contract Law at the University van Amsterdam, 2008, pp. 1-16.
